If agreed on the political payback course, which would be concerned directing the mainstream Serbia

Basically half-audibly, they would not reach the journalists and the media in each political party experience failure in the elections, he finds himself one of the involved officials to ask the question: what happened to the people? Then more elaborate nonsensical theories and seek causal relationships payback in the wrong place and the wrong things, in order to justify a failure to construct an excuse. The problem is not the people, but in the party leadership and his policies.
The question payback is: why political organizations that oppose the recognition of the so-called factual. Republic of Kosovo, failed to motivate many citizens and significantly affect the behavior of the Serbian authorities? Why is perceived failure? Is it, as it can be heard in conversations or read on social networks folk "tired of Kosovo", "confused propaganda", "frightened by threats payback of the West" or perhaps too believed the promises of an easy life on the EU !? It is true that to some extent he can talk about the "collective murder" media "products Depression", there is fear and beliefs and sometimes false promises, but it is far from being this crucial fact for determination of Serbs. Because if they did, Boris Tadic would still be president of Serbia and DS main pillar of executive power, payback Serbia would largely been a member of NATO, and the football team of the Republic of Kosovo would be hosted in Belgrade at least twice a year! Tomislav Nikolic's victory in the presidential election is essentially meant "giving Serbs" of further EU integration, or at least pointed to the winding down of the people of this process. What is the current government has continued the same way as the previous one, does not have to mean absolutely nothing. Very quickly, we can show that the binding of Serbian authorities on the subject of EU integration part of the problem rather than part of the solution to the very authorities and parties that make it up.
Evidently, the people there is no majority sentiment that "Kosovo Serbs to give up," nor the willingness to support the further erosion of the state. What's more, time will show that there is a serious payback energy for the young population to defend the country! Why then so-called "patriotic bloc" payback has failed to motivate the citizens of Serbia and welcoming autumn as the most important political force in the country? payback
On the right half Serbian intellectual-political scene has long been not a "ventilated space" is much different "lobby group" and stakeholder coalition ... It is the "veterans" who give themselves the right to determine payback who is "can enter the patriots' and who does not. As far as the opposition political parties, at DSS is noticeable chronic fatigue; Radicals are (fully) bezidejni managed to reduce the whole party program to just one goal (one expectation!), And the doors are due to political inexperience and lack of concentration, in the first election in which they participated probably achieved the best result in its history! The SNS and SPS largest number of disgruntled individuals silent, partly because of party discipline, and partly unwilling payback to sacrifice comfort that the government provides. In the DS sometimes payback few, but influential "right wing" no longer exists.
Surely, in this lethargy Serbia could quickly snap out if there was a serious cooperation in the opposition payback ranks. Among political parties, associations and individuals to join the movement. There remains, however, an open question: how would people in this movement together? Would you like to party with existing infrastructure and with the help of influential groups and individuals have managed to create something more if they joined forces? Maybe it. But with a big "maybe". Voters are not stones, and to transfer them from one place to another! What are these three parties in the previous election received support sevenths of voters is no guarantee that the coming together repeated the same result. Similarly, there is no guarantee that the plugging of distinguished and influential individuals of this movement rating increased.
The problem is not in the organizational structure, but also in politics. Therefore, the "patriotic bloc" and those who want to belong to him, not the question of all questions to consolidate existing forces payback and organize negotiations payback on future joint election payback list, but to establish policies that will support a larger number of citizens of Serbia. Organizational association does not necessarily lead to a synergetic effect. Therefore, the aim should not be harmonization formula for the partition of the mandate of the deputies' list, nor stubbornly insisting on making a fast pre-election payback coalition (even though it should not be excluded), but the reconciliation of political objectives pursued. It is necessary to find an answer to the question, what is a "political course" patriotic bloc.
If agreed on the political payback course, which would be concerned directing the mainstream Serbian policy in the future, representatives of the "patriotic bloc" would have already decided what they are worth more: whether to perform together at the election, or that everyone is going with his list. It would have been a matter of electoral math, as well as policies of "opening the door" payback for supporters of political parties that are now advocating for some other values and different policies. For some of them it might be acceptable to gather about